New Water Plant for Security

A new water treatment plant is being constructed at 4140 Lincoln Plaza Drive for the Security area. The water supplied by this plant is hoped to provide a long-term solution for treating water pulled from an aquifer saturated with toxic chemicals used for decades by nearby Peterson Air Force Base in a firefighting foam. Photo taken Aug. 4, 2019.

An upcoming federal study aims to answer a question lingering over the lives of tens of thousands of Security, Widefield and Fountain residents:

Exactly how saturated are the toxic firefighting chemicals floating around in their bloodstreams?

The federal Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry plans to soon begin recruiting southern El Paso County residents for a study aiming to finally understand the exposure levels that residents face from toxic perfluorinated compounds that have fouled their groundwater for years.

Researchers plan to begin mailing notices to randomly selected residents requesting their participation in April. If people don’t answer, researchers will go door-to-door to ask residents to take part. Testing would likely take place in June.

The goal is to better understand exposure levels across the community — a feat that can only be accomplished by randomly selecting participants, said Christopher Reh, associate director of ATSDR. The agency is part of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Reh added that there’s good reason for residents to say “yes” to those researchers.

“It’s a national issue, and only through participation we can better understand the scope and extent of this issue,” Reh said. “And what we learn from a given community can help inform us for other communities.”

The chemicals in question have been used for decades in household items, as well as in a firefighting foam at nearby Peterson Air Force Base, the Air Force Academy and hundreds of other military installations across the world. They have been linked to health ailments, including cancers, liver disease and high cholesterol.

Thousands of types of perfluorinated compounds exist, and a growing number of them have raised red flags for the dangers they present. Government agencies also have referred to them with the more inclusive term of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances — or PFAS.

The upcoming study is the first of two planned in the coming years for people living in water districts that have relied, in part, on the contaminated Widefield aquifer. The underground waterway stretches along Interstate 25 from South Academy Boulevard to Fountain.

The first study will only examine exposure levels in the area — in other words, determining to what degree the chemicals exist in a typical resident’s bloodstream. Fourteen to 17 different types of perfluorinated compounds are expected to be examined.

The second study — which kicks into gear in fall 2020 — seeks to answer two more difficult questions:

• Whether or not chemical levels in someone’s blood or urine will make them sick now or later in life;

• And whether a current health condition is caused by exposure to the chemicals.

“We have a lot more animal data than we do human data for this,” Reh said. “But the animal data tells you where to look and how to look. It’s really the human data you need in order to determine what’s the risk to people.

“With something like cholesterol, we know that if your level of cholesterol is 212, a doctor can tell you with fairly good confidence what’s your chance of having a heart attack. We’re not even near that with this” batch of chemicals.

For that second health-focused study, 1,000 adults and 300 children will be asked to give blood samples and provide health information so that researchers can better understand which conditions are caused by the chemicals. Admission requirements for that study will be different, and people will generally be allowed to volunteer themselves to participate, rather than being randomly selected.

That health study will examine several ailments, but cancer won’t be one of them, Reh said. That’s because not enough people will be enrolled to analyze for that disease.

It will be led by the Colorado School of Public Health and a professor there — John Adgate.

Southern El Paso County is one of only two areas in the nation where both federal studies will be conducted. Eight communities will be included in the exposure study, and seven are part of the health study.

Both studies come on the heels of another Adgate-led study, which offered the first glimpse of exposure levels in residents’ bloodstreams.

The 220-person study found extremely high levels of toxic chemicals in study participants’ bloodstreams compared with other Americans. The results, released in December 2018, showed elevated levels of two perfluorinated compounds that are included in an Environmental Protection Agency health advisory. But the most prevalent variety — known as PFHxS — is not covered by EPA health advisories.

Perfluorinated chemicals are not regulated by the agency in the same way as lead, arsenic or other dangerous chemicals.

Residents’ exposure to the chemicals appears to have changed in recent years. Water districts in the area shut off access to the aquifer three to four years ago, and they say they now remove the chemicals to non-detectable levels before sending it to residents’ houses.

But the chemicals are made of remarkably strong molecular bonds, and they remain in the human body for years upon years — hence their nickname as “forever chemicals.”

There are several differences between Adgate’s previous study and the two upcoming federal studies.

The results released by Adgate in 2018 did not include any analysis that could hint at the health effects of the chemicals.

And, in a major difference from the upcoming April study, Adgate’s previous study sought volunteers to participate. The upcoming exposure study this spring will randomly select participants.

The exposure study this spring also will test dust in residents’ houses for the chemicals, since they are commonly found in nonstick household items such as Teflon products and carpet cleaners.

“They have a lot of the characteristics of chemicals that cause us — as environmental health professionals — a lot of concern,” Reh said.

“It’s a national issue, and only through participation we can better understand the scope and extent of this issue. And what we learn from a given community can help inform us for other communities.” Christopher Reh, associate director of ATSDR
Load comments