Facebook emails show how it sought to leverage user data
Caption +

FILE - In this file photo dated March 29, 2018, the logo for social media giant Facebook, appears on screens at the Nasdaq MarketSite, in New York's Times Square. The British Parliament’s media committee seized confidential Facebook documents from a developer and on Wednesday Dec. 5, 2018, has released a cache of documents that show Facebook considered charging developers for data access. (AP Photo/Richard Drew, FILE)

Show MoreShow Less

Facebook emails showing the company threatened to cut off data to potential rivals added a new target for the regulatory armory that is being amassed by European regulators.

The publication of the emails by U.K lawmakers preceded a vote by EU legislators Thursday that backed draft rules requiring online platforms to treat businesses — including rivals — fairly.

In the new year Germany will conclude an antitrust probe that may call on Facebook to change privacy terms. EU privacy regulators are also armed with the power to fine for data breaches, following the roll-out of GDPR in May.

“Facebook is now on notice that we cannot continue to undermine the trust citizens place, not only in our online platforms, but our democracy itself,” said Claude Moraes, a British member of the European Parliament who quizzed Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg at a June hearing. “A big stick is available to the EU in the form of competition and taxation powers.”

A trove of internal correspondence, published online Wednesday, provided a look into the ways Facebook executives, including Zuckerberg, treated information posted by users like a commodity that could be harnessed in service of business goals.

Apps were invited to use Facebook’s network to grow, as long as that increased usage of Facebook. Certain competitors, in a list reviewed by Zuckerberg himself, were not allowed to use Facebook’s tools and data without his personal sign-off.

The message may increase scrutiny around whether Facebook is a monopoly — one of the social network’s biggest current political risks. Damien Geradin, a lawyer at Euclid Law, said the refusal of access to Vine data could be seen as a potential refusal to deal with rivals. He said Facebook would need to be shown as essential to users, and it’s “not clear it is.”

Tim Wu, a professor at Columbia Law School, said the emails “suggest exclusionary conduct” against Vine and “clearly add to the case that the acquisition of WhatsApp was illegal.”

New legislation might require Internet giants to treat rival services “equally without discrimination” with some exceptions, according to rules voted by EU lawmakers on Thursday. Their version still needs to be backed by the full European Parliament, likely next week, and then the final text of the law must be negotiated with EU governments.

Germany already sees Facebook as the country’s dominant social network, which puts the company on warning. The German Federal Cartel Office probe focuses on the way the social network scoops up information on how users surf the web.

The power internet giants wield with access to user data and the ability to crush rivals by cutting off links to it, is increasingly a focus for European regulators. Both the EU and Germany are looking at how Amazon.com Inc. treats sellers on its platform, with the EU zeroing in on the advantage it gets on rivals’ bestselling items to check if it then starts selling its own-brand copycats.

Privacy officials are also showing impatience with Facebook, with British Information Commissioner Elizabeth Denham telling the U.K. Parliament that the company needs to significantly change its business model and practices.


Load comments