Save this content for laterSave this content on your device for later, even while offline Sign in with FacebookSign in with your Facebook account Close

US appeals panel kicks back checkpoint protest issue

By: ANITA SNOW, Associated Press
February 13, 2018 Updated: February 13, 2018 at 10:44 pm
0
photo - FILE - In this May 27, 2015, file photo, two protesters carry a large banner as they walk toward a U.S. Border Patrol checkpoint on a two-lane road in Amado, Ariz., about 20 miles north of the Mexican border. The U.S. Circuit of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit says it lacked the information necessary to decide if a U.S. Border Patrol enforcement zone around a highway checkpoint in southern Arizona was a nonpublic forum as argued by the District Court in Arizona in a case that arose from roadside protests. (AP Photo/Astrid Galvan, File)
FILE - In this May 27, 2015, file photo, two protesters carry a large banner as they walk toward a U.S. Border Patrol checkpoint on a two-lane road in Amado, Ariz., about 20 miles north of the Mexican border. The U.S. Circuit of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit says it lacked the information necessary to decide if a U.S. Border Patrol enforcement zone around a highway checkpoint in southern Arizona was a nonpublic forum as argued by the District Court in Arizona in a case that arose from roadside protests. (AP Photo/Astrid Galvan, File) 

PHOENIX (AP) — It's up to the federal government that barred protesters from an enforcement zone around an Arizona immigration checkpoint to prove it constitutes a non-public forum, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit said in a ruling Tuesday that could have broader implications for other demonstrations.

The appeals panel said it didn't have the information necessary to determine if the zones around the road stops are non-public. It revived the case by kicking it back to the U.S. District Court in Arizona.

The District Court had earlier thrown out the case by two protesters who sued U.S. agencies for keeping them away from an enforcement area around an immigration checkpoint near their rural homes. Residents from the community of Arivaca had argued the checkpoint promotes racial profiling and the militarization of the area about 20 miles (32 kilometers) north of the Mexico border.

Mitra Ebadolahi, border litigation staff attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union in California's San Diego and Imperial counties, said the ruling was technical but nevertheless important because it could have wider significance for other protests.

Ebadolahi's office worked with the ACLU in Arizona and Covington & Burling LLP of San Francisco representing the demonstrators against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection and the Border Patrol, as well as officials with those agencies.

Plaintiffs Peter Ragan and Leesa Jacobson argued they had the right to protest at the road stops.

But the lower federal court dismissed the case after agreeing with the U.S. government that the enforcement zones around the Arizona checkpoints were non-public areas and officials could keep protesters out.

The higher court has now ruled "the government has the burden to prove that it is justified to move protesters from the area," Ebadolahi said.

"It's really a win for the principle of the First Amendment and the broader idea that the government cannot unilaterally restrict free speech in a public area," she added. "If it had gone differently, it would have been a blow."

The Border Patrol office in Tucson referred questions to the public affairs office of the Customs and Border Protection agency in Washington, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the high court's ruling.

Federal authorities say the checkpoints located on highways and small roads north of the U.S.-Mexico line are essential to help them catch people who violate immigration laws, as well as drug smugglers and human traffickers. But many area residents complain they must answer questions about their citizenship each time they drive by.

Other local residents back the checkpoints, saying they're needed for border enforcement.

The Border Patrol has dozens of checkpoints around the American Southwest and in northern states near the U.S.-Canada boundary.

___

This story corrects spelling of the attorney's first name to 'Mitra' in the 4th paragraph.

Register to the Colorado Springs Gazette
Incognito Mode Your browser is in Incognito mode

You vanished!

We welcome you to read all of our stories by signing into your account. If you don't have a subscription, please subscribe today for daily award winning journalism.

Register to the Colorado Springs Gazette
Subscribe to the Colorado Springs Gazette

It appears that you value local journalism. Thank you.

Subscribe today for unlimited digital access with 50% fewer ads for a faster browsing experience.

Already a Subscriber? LOGIN HERE

Wake up with today's top stories in your inbox

Wake up with today's top stories in your inbox

or
Already a print subscriber?
Already a digital subscriber?
 
This is your last FREE article for the month
This is your last FREE article for the month

Subscribe now and enjoy Unlimited Digital Access to Gazette.com

Only 99 cents for Unlimited Digital Access for 1 month
Then $2.31/week, billed monthly, cancel anytime
Already a print subscriber?
Already a digital subscriber?

 
You have reached your article limit for the month
You have reached your article limit for the month

We hope that you've enjoyed your complimentary access to Gazette.com

Only 99 cents for Unlimited Digital Access for 1 month
Then $2.31/week, billed monthly, cancel anytime
Already a print subscriber?
Already a digital subscriber?
 

Exclusive Subscriber Content

You read The Gazette because you care about your community and the local stories you can't find anywhere else.

Only 99 cents for Unlimited Digital Access for 1 month
Then $2.31/week, billed monthly, cancel anytime
Already a print subscriber? Get Access | Already a digital subscriber? Log In
 
articles remaining
×
Thank you for your interest in local journalism.
Gain unlimited access, 50% fewer ads and a faster browsing experience.