Colorado Springs News, Sports & Business

Gazette Premium Content MOVIE REVIEW: 'Fraid things don't end well in 'Carrie' remake

by RENE RODRIGUEZ The Miami Herald - Published: October 18, 2013

When Brian De Palma adapted Stephen King's novel "Carrie" for film in 1976, he turned the simple story of a bullied teenage girl with telekinetic powers into a dreamy, pop-horror fantasia - a lush, operatic fright show that grooved on its excesses.

De Palma's "Carrie" became so iconic that it remains fresh and vital 37 years later - practically an eternity in Hollywood time - and casts an imposing shadow over the new version by director Kimberly Peirce ("Boys Don't Cry").

Instead of trying to outdo the grandness of the original, Peirce takes a more grounded approach, treating the characters of Carrie White (Chloe Grace Moretz) and her religious-fanatic mother Margaret (Julianne Moore) with more emotional gravity and empathy.

Although the beautiful Moretz looks nothing like the "chunky girl with pimples on her neck and back and buttocks" that King described in his book, the actress invests the character with a fragile vulnerability that runs deeper than her unkempt hair and shabby clothes. She looks like she wishes she could shrink away into herself and disappear.

When she gets her first period while taking a shower at school after P.E. class, she howls with terror and panic - she doesn't understand what's happening to her - and the other girls in the locker room descend on her like a mob, mocking and taunting and taking delight in her hysteria.

But menstruation also awakens something in Carrie - the ability to move objects with her mind. The power emboldens the timid girl, even though she must keep it hidden from her mom, who would undoubtedly consider telekinesis the devil's work.

Moore plays Carrie's monstrous mama as a tragic figure, a sheltered and awkward woman who is as confused and befuddled as her daughter. Margaret is constantly cutting and scratching herself - flagellation as a form of worship - and although her parenting skills are misguided to the point of abuse, Moore makes us understand why she does the things she does. The world betrayed her, and she's not going to let the same thing happen to Carrie.

She will fail, of course, in a most spectacular fashion. Carrie is going to suffer, and that's where the movie starts running into problems. Peirce is good at illustrating the complexities and contradictions inherent in all her characters, but she fares much worse with the horror elements in the film, relying too heavily on cheap-looking CGI for ineffective shocks - she totally flubs the movie's Big Moment - and turning her heroine into a kind of demonic superhero who uses her hands like Magneto to manipulate objects (this Carrie looks like she should have been part of "X-Men: First Class").

The beauty of De Palma's movie is that the crazier the story became, the scarier and more unnerving the film got, building to an enormous "Gotcha!" scare in its final scene. This "Carrie" becomes less involving as it goes along, ceding its emotional power to special effects and unconvincing gore, and culminating with a closing shot so lame and uninspired, it's as if the filmmakers just gave up and called it a day.

"carrie"

Cast: Julianne Moore, Chloe Grace Moretz

Director: Kimberly Peirce

Running time: 1 hour, 39 minutes

Rated: R for bloody violence, disturbing images, language and some sexual content

Grade: B-

Comment Policy

Our commenting system has changed. Please register or login with your gazette.com account to comment on a story. Click here for information.

You've reached your 4 FREE premium stories this month

Get 4 more FREE stories

Simply register to continue.

Register

Subscribe now

Get access unlimited access to premium stories.

Subscribe
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement