Save this content for laterSave this content on your device for later, even while offline Sign in with FacebookSign in with your Facebook account Close

Correction: Pot Dispensary Resistance story

By: The Associated Press
February 12, 2014 Updated: February 12, 2014 at 6:34 pm

SALEM, Ore. (AP) — In a Feb. 11 story about Oregon's law permitting medical marijuana dispensaries, The Associated Press included an erroneous headline. Some communities are seeking the authority to ban medical marijuana dispensaries, not medical marijuana.

A corrected version of the story is below:

Oregon communities seek option to ban dispensaries

Oregon legislators consider allowing local governments to ban marijuana dispensaries


Associated Press

SALEM, Ore. (AP) — A state Senate committee hearing Tuesday focused on whether Oregon communities should be allowed to ban medical marijuana dispensaries.

Advocates of the proposal said communities should have the right to decide for themselves, and opponents said local bans would be unfair to patients who need marijuana to alleviate their ailments.

"I think time is what some of these city councils need to really examine this further," Sam Chapman, a consultant who helped write the state's dispensary law, told the Senate Judiciary Committee. "This is a large issue on their plate."

The Legislature last year approved legislation allowing medical marijuana stores, but a number of communities don't want the facilities and want the right to keep them from opening.

Chapman said he's been working with the Beaverton City Council to help its members better understand the dispensary law and what authority they have regarding the facilities.

With Tuesday's hearing, lawmakers have begun considering legislation that would allow local communities to regulate, restrict or prohibit medical marijuana facilities authorized under state law.

Rob Bovett, legal counsel for the Association of Oregon Counties, called the Oregon medical marijuana system the "most unregulated program" in the country and said that while some communities are willing to accept the dispensaries, others have a "wait and see" mentality. They believe they already have the authority to regulate or prohibit the dispensaries in their areas, he said, but the bill seeks to clarify that authority and "avoid needless litigation" fighting for that belief in court.

But Sen. Arnie Roblan, D-Coos Bay, likened the dispensaries to pharmacies and said banning them would be the same as keeping people from getting needed medication.

Sen. Michael Dembrow, D-Portland, said he shared Roblan's concern about giving communities the right to impose an "outright ban."

Speaking in support of the bill, SB 1531, Tualatin Mayor Lou Ogden said that "mass access" to the drug is a greater threat than people having to go out of their way to have their prescriptions filled.

Oregon voters passed a medical marijuana law in 1998. About 60,000 Oregonians have medical marijuana cards. Many have claimed that without dispensaries, it is difficult for them to acquire marijuana. Under the law, holders of medical marijuana cards can grow a certain amount for themselves or have designated people grow it for them.

In addition to improving access to marijuana for legitimate patients, the dispensary law passed by the Legislature last year is also intended to keep marijuana grown for medical purposes from ending up on the black market.

Beginning March 3, medical marijuana facilities registered with the Oregon Health Authority will be allowed to store marijuana and dispense it to Oregonians with medical marijuana cards or their caregivers. OHA rules require the marijuana to be tested for safety and set requirements for employee background checks, security systems and inspections at the facilities.

Under the law, dispensaries are not permitted within 1,000 feet of schools. At Tuesday's hearing, the Senate Judiciary Committee also took a look at proposed amendments to SB 1531 that would extend that to preschools. The amendments would also require medical marijuana products to be in child-resistant packaging and would prohibit products made or packaged in a way that would be attractive to children.

The committee also heard testimony on a second bill, SB 1556, which would put the question to voters about whether to legalize marijuana for adult recreational use.


Reach reporter Chad Garland on Twitter at

Register to the Colorado Springs Gazette
Incognito Mode Your browser is in Incognito mode

You vanished!

We welcome you to read all of our stories by signing into your account. If you don't have a subscription, please subscribe today for daily award winning journalism.

Register to the Colorado Springs Gazette
Subscribe to the Colorado Springs Gazette

It appears that you value local journalism. Thank you.

Subscribe today for unlimited digital access with 50% fewer ads for a faster browsing experience.

Already a Subscriber? LOGIN HERE

Wake up with today's top stories in your inbox

Wake up with today's top stories in your inbox

Already a print subscriber?
Already a digital subscriber?
This is your last FREE article for the month
This is your last FREE article for the month

Subscribe now and enjoy Unlimited Digital Access to

Only 99 cents for Unlimited Digital Access for 1 month
Then $2.31/week, billed monthly, cancel anytime
Already a print subscriber?
Already a digital subscriber?

You have reached your article limit for the month
You have reached your article limit for the month

We hope that you've enjoyed your complimentary access to

Only 99 cents for Unlimited Digital Access for 1 month
Then $2.31/week, billed monthly, cancel anytime
Already a print subscriber?
Already a digital subscriber?

articles remaining
Thank you for your interest in local journalism.
Gain unlimited access, 50% fewer ads and a faster browsing experience.