With the motto "Food With Integrity," Chipotle Mexican Grill's brand is based on ethical fast food. But hundreds of workers in nine lawsuits in six states allege the company's moral high ground on pork, beef and chicken doesn't extend to its cooks, cashiers and managers.
The lawsuits share common allegations: Denver-based Chipotle cheated employees out of pay by making them work off the clock or misclassifying them to avoid paying overtime. One in Colorado alleges hourly employees were automatically clocked out even though they were still working. The largest lawsuit underway alleges managers-in-training, known as "apprentices," are actually glorified burrito rollers with minimal managerial responsibilities and should be entitled to overtime pay.
The cases are part of a national trend - over a decade long - where workers increasingly turn to federal courts to recoup wages they allege their employers have illegally withheld.
A Chipotle spokesman dismissed the lawsuits against the restaurant chain as "nothing more than allegations."
"Our labor practices are fully compliant with applicable labor laws," Chris Arnold wrote in an email. "In fact, we have built a culture that creates unprecedented opportunity for our employees."
A focus on labor costs
As of April, Coloradans were among 643 plaintiffs suing Chipotle for allegedly unfair labor practices.
Brittany Swa is one of them. She worked at Centennial-area Chipotle stores for almost three years, moving up from crew member to apprentice and finally to general manager. The staffing software calculated how many employees to schedule every day to be profitable given the store's sales, she said, with her bonus on the line if she didn't hit the right numbers.
"The goal is to obviously have a little less people so you're making a little bit more profit in your store," Swa said.
She and other Chipotle apprentices allege they mostly worked the same tasks as hourly workers did: grilling chicken, mixing guacamole, rolling burritos and ringing up orders. According to Chipotle's website, apprentices make almost twice as much as kitchen and service managers, who are paid hourly. Apprentices are classified as exempt employees and not entitled to overtime pay. They worked up to 60 hours a week but were not paid for time over 40 hours as a matter of corporate policy, the lawsuits argue. (Unlike other fast-food restaurants, Chipotle stores are not independent franchises.)
Swa paid a personal cost for the long hours, she said. She constantly left her infant son with her mom and missed his first steps, first words and even his first solid food.
"I was always getting texts and pictures from my mom, like, 'Look what he did!' " Swa said.
Separate cases filed in Colorado and Minnesota allege the computer timekeeping system automatically clocked workers out after 40 hours, even though they had to clean the store or attend mandatory meetings. They allege managers received bonuses based on keeping labor costs low.
"These are people who were working really long hours for not a lot of pay. They need to be compensated for their time," said the plaintiffs' lawyer, Karen O'Connor. "If you force people to work off the clock, you're going to have to pay them anyway."
Chipotle denied the allegations in court and said the company complies with labor law. Additionally, the company argues it pays for off-duty meals and breaks, which is above what the law requires.
Chipotle has sought to have the Colorado lawsuit dismissed as a duplicative case.
Working off the clock
As of last year, Chipotle had about 53,090 employees and 1,783 restaurants in the U.S. and abroad, and inspectors have found illegal practices similar to plaintiffs' allegations at stores across the country, U.S. Department of Labor investigation records obtained by I-News show.
In 2012, the computer at a Cincinnati store automatically clocked out a worker, even though she was still cleaning the store. But because what she was owed was less than $20, investigators found, her claim was dismissed.
In 2013, a manager at a Miami- area store deleted hours from the computer when workers stayed late cleaning the store, but federal investigators found the deleted time was "not substantial."
The Department of Labor ordered three Chipotle stores outside Portland, Ore., to repay 24 workers an average of $706 in unpaid wages in 2012 because employees worked off the clock after closing the restaurants for the night.
"Additionally, there appeared to be a culture of off-the-clock work as the situation extended beyond a single manager and to more than one store in the area," an investigator wrote in a Tualatin, Ore., Chipotle investigation.
The Department of Labor levied $5,280 in civil penalties for pay violations at a Happy Valley, Ore., Chipotle store.
"The managers were under a tremendous amount of pressure to meet labor goals," an investigator found.
Since 2006, federal labor authorities have investigated 24 Chipotle locations nationwide and recovered a total of $19,440 in unpaid wages for 36 employees, government data show.
Loose government enforcement is one reason private attorneys are heralding cases of unpaid wages, said labor law enforcement expert Catherine Ruckelshaus, of the National Employment Law Project.
"The private bar stepped in to take up that slack," Ruckelshaus said.
None of Chipotle's 74 Colorado stores have been investigated by the federal Department of Labor, according to an I-News analysis of federal data.
Lawsuits on the increase
Employers in other industries are facing an increase in employee lawsuits. Nationally, lawsuits for unpaid wages have increased 137 percent since 2004, from 3,426 to 8,126 in 2014, according to federal judicial caseload statistics.
The trend extends to Colorado, too. The federal district court in Denver saw 96 lawsuits filed under the Fair Labor Standards Act in 2014, up from 22 cases in 2004, according to filings listed on federal courts' Public Access to Court Electronic Records, or PACER, database.
Richard Alfred, of the law firm Seyfarth Shaw, which defends such cases, calls the trend an "epidemic" but doesn't agree it's caused by lax enforcement. The Fair Labor Standards Act, which governs minimum wage and overtime payment, is 77 years old and hasn't kept up with the current economy, he said. That mismatch creates litigation opportunities for plaintiffs, who are better informed of their rights than before, and lawyers looking for more clients, he said.
"A lot of these lawsuits that are brought are 'gotcha' lawsuits that are technical violations," Alfred said.
In Colorado, once workers have filed lawsuits in federal court, they have almost always been able to resolve their complaints without going to trial, according to an I-News analysis of lawsuits filed and terminated in the past three years. Those records show that 32 percent of case dockets mentioned that settlement had been reached, and 48 percent were dismissed by a plaintiff alone or jointly with the defendant, an indication that the parties may have resolved the dispute out of court.
The court ruled in favor of the worker's employer in only 3 percent of cases and in favor of workers in only 3 percent, the I-News analysis found.
Workers can recoup attorney's fees as part of a settlement, but in the Colorado cases, each party was often responsible for his or her own costs, which can reach thousands of dollars.
In April, a Maryland Chipotle worker settled her case for alleged "wage theft" and received $5,727 in back wages and damages, including attorney's fees. Chipotle denied all allegations. Workers in Florida and California reached confidential settlements in three lawsuits against Chipotle for unfair labor practices.
Former Chipotle employee Swa liked working at the restaurant, but she thinks the company should treat its store employees better by increasing time for training and promoting work-life balance.
"Definitely an area of opportunity for them would be integrity with their employees," Swa said.
The Gazette brings you this report in partnership with Rocky Mountain PBS I-News. Learn more at rmpbs.org/news. Contact Anna Boiko-Weyrauch at email@example.com.