Save this content for laterSave this content on your device for later, even while offline Sign in with FacebookSign in with your Facebook account Close

Douglas Bruce must appear for deposition, district court says

By: EILEEN WELSOME
May 11, 2010
0

 A Denver district court judge has issued an order requiring anti-tax advocate Douglas Bruce to appear for a deposition in connection with campaign finance complaints filed against the backers of three statewide measures that will be on the November ballot.

District Court Judge Brian Whitney issued the order on Monday at the request of the Colorado Secretary of State’s Office. The court order stipulates that there must be proof that Bruce, who lives in Colorado Springs, has been served with notice of the deposition before May 17.

The three ballot issues, Amendment 60, Amendment 61 and Proposition 101, would curtail the ability of local and state governments to borrow and spend money. The measures were put on the ballot after both professional and amateur petition circulators collected hundreds of thousands of signatures in 2009.

According to Secretary of State’s Office records, eight of the professional signature collectors lived in an apartment house that Bruce owns.

In a April 28 motion field with the Office of Administrative Courts, Bruce said that he was told that the deposition was cancelled after he filed a motion to quash it. “It was a case that did not involve me, alleging campaign finance violation claims by six people in the metro area,” he wrote. “The subpoena bore an unreadable rubber-stamped anonymous signature and no printed name below. It demanded I show up, testify, and furnish private business records, and made other patently improper demands.”

Bruce also alleged that subpoena was "illegal and void" because attorneys involved in the case were supposed to submit documents on recycled paper.

Bruce also pointed to the “hostility” between himself and Mark Grueskin, the lawyer who is pursuing the campaign finance complaints on behalf of various private and public organizations, including Protect Colorado’s Communities.

Bruce noted that Grueskin was co-counsel in 1988 in an “illegal and perjurious effort” to remove from the ballot his first petition for the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights. Although that effort of Bruce's failed, such a measure was put on the ballot as a constitutional amendment and approved by voters in 1992. The amendment has limited government growth and made tax hikes subject to voter approval.

 

 

 

Register to the Colorado Springs Gazette
Incognito Mode Your browser is in Incognito mode

You vanished!

We welcome you to read all of our stories by signing into your account. If you don't have a subscription, please subscribe today for daily award winning journalism.

Register to the Colorado Springs Gazette
Register to the Colorado Springs Gazette
Subscribe to the Colorado Springs Gazette

It appears that you value local journalism. Thank you.

Subscribe today for unlimited digital access with 50% fewer ads for a faster browsing experience.

Already a Subscriber? LOGIN HERE

Subscribe to the Colorado Springs Gazette

It appears that you value local journalism. Thank you.

Subscribe today for unlimited digital access with 50% fewer ads for a faster browsing experience.

Subscribe to the Colorado Springs Gazette

Some news is free.
Exceptional journalism takes time, effort and your support.

Already a Subscriber? LOGIN HERE

articles remaining
×
Thank you for your interest in local journalism.
Gain unlimited access, 50% fewer ads and a faster browsing experience.